from the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
See other cases from the Eleventh Circuit.
Petition DENIED.
Reply of petitioners Luis Sanchez, et al. filed. (Distributed)
Brief of respondent United States in opposition filed.
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is further extended to and including July 10, 2024.
Motion to extend the time to file a response from June 12, 2024 to July 10, 2024, submitted to The Clerk.
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including June 12, 2024.
Brief amici curiae of The Rutherford Institute and Manhattan Institute for Policy Research filed.
Brief amicus curiae of Florida Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers filed.
Brief amici curiae of The Cato Institute, et al. filed.
Motion to extend the time to file a response from May 13, 2024 to June 12, 2024, submitted to The Clerk.
Brief amicus curiae of The Buckeye Institute filed.
Response Requested. (Due May 13, 2024)
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due April 22, 2024)
Application (23A722) granted by Justice Thomas extending the time to file until March 20, 2024.
Application (23A722) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from February 19, 2024 to April 19, 2024, submitted to Justice Thomas.
Luis Sanchez, et al., Petitioner, represented by Stephen Francis Raiola
United States, Respondent, represented by Elizabeth B. Prelogar
Florida Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers, Amicus Curiae, represented by Christopher Harding Casey
The Buckeye Institute, Amicus Curiae, represented by Jay Randall Carson
The Cato Institute and The Goldwater Institute, Amicus Curiae, represented by Thomas Michael Johnson Jr.
The Rutherford Institute and Manhattan Institute for Policy Research, Amicus Curiae, represented by Benjamin Conrad Block