Denied

No. 23-1132

Lyft, Inc. v. California

from the Court of Appeal of California, First Appellate District

See other cases from California.

Docket Entries

Petition DENIED.

DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/30/2024.

Reply of petitioner Lyft, Inc. filed. (Distributed)

Brief of respondents California, et al. in opposition filed. VIDED.

Brief amicus curiae of Professor George A. Bermann filed. VIDED.

Brief amici curiae of Retail Litigation Center, Inc., et al. filed. VIDED.

Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including June 20, 2024, for all respondents. See Rule 30.1.

Motion to extend the time to file a response from May 20, 2024 to June 19, 2024, submitted to The Clerk.

Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due May 20, 2024)

Parties

Lyft, Inc., Petitioner, represented by Elaine Janet Goldenberg

California, Respondent, represented by Joshua A. Klein

Amici Curiae

Professor George A. Bermann, Amicus Curiae, represented by Elliot Friedman

Retail Litigation Center, Inc.; California Retail Association, Amicus Curiae, represented by Jessica Lynn Ellsworth

 
Last updated: April 18, 2026