Denied

No. 24-1020

Uber Technologies, Inc., a Delaware Corporation, et al. v. Amie Drammeh, et al.

from the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

See other cases from the Ninth Circuit.

Docket Entries

Petition DENIED.

Reply of petitioners Uber Technologies, Inc., et al. filed. (Distributed)

DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/29/2025.

Brief of respondent Jane Doe in opposition filed.

Brief of respondents Amie Drammeh, et al. in opposition filed.

Brief amicus curiae of Washington Legal Foundation filed.

The Motions to extend the time to file responses are granted and the time is extended to and including June 13, 2025, for all respondents.

Motion of respondent Jane Doe to extend the time to file a response from May 14, 2025 to June 13, 2025, submitted to The Clerk.

Motion of respondents Amie Drammeh, et al. to extend the time to file a response from May 14, 2025 to June 13, 2025, submitted to The Clerk.

Response Requested. (Due May 14, 2025)

DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/25/2025.

Waiver of right of respondent Jane Doe to respond filed.

Waiver of right of respondents Amie Drammeh, et al to respond filed.

Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due April 24, 2025)

Application (24A690) granted by Justice Kagan extending the time to file until March 21, 2025.

Response to application from respondent Amie Drammeh, Yusepha Ceesay, and Maram Ceesay filed.

Application (24A690) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from January 22, 2025 to March 21, 2025, submitted to Justice Kagan.

Parties

Uber Technologies, Inc., et al., Petitioner, represented by Theane Evangelis Kapur

Amie Drammeh, et al, Respondent, represented by Brent Marcus Rosenthal

Jane Doe, Respondent, represented by Tiffany Joana Gates

Amici Curiae

Washington Legal Foundation, Amicus Curiae, represented by Cory L. Andrews

 
Last updated: April 18, 2026