from the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
See other cases from the Sixth Circuit.
Judgment Issued.
Petition GRANTED. Judgment VACATED and case REMANDED for further consideration in light of <i>Lackey</i> v. <i>Stinnie</i>, 604 U. S. 192 (2025).
Reply of petitioner Robert Holman filed.
Brief of respondents Brooke L. Rollins, Secretary, Department of Agriculture, et al. filed.
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is further extended to and including November 5, 2025.
Motion to extend the time to file a response from October 6, 2025 to November 5, 2025, submitted to The Clerk.
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is further extended to and including October 6, 2025.
Motion to extend the time to file a response from September 4, 2025 to October 6, 2025, submitted to The Clerk.
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is further extended to and including September 4, 2025.
Motion to extend the time to file a response from August 6, 2025 to September 4, 2025, submitted to The Clerk.
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including August 6, 2025.
Motion to extend the time to file a response from July 7, 2025 to August 6, 2025, submitted to The Clerk.
Brief amicus curiae of Pacific Legal Foundation filed.
Response Requested. (Due July 7, 2025)
Waiver of right of respondent Rollins, Brooke, et al. to respond filed.
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due June 6, 2025)
Robert Holman, Petitioner, represented by William E. Trachman
Rollins, Brooke, et al., Respondent, represented by D. John Sauer
Pacific Legal Foundation, Amicus Curiae, represented by Alison Somin