from the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
See other cases from the Ninth Circuit.
Petition DENIED.
Reply of petitioners Nutramax Laboratories, Inc., et al. filed. (Distributed)
Brief of respondents Justin Lytle, et al. in opposition filed.
Brief amici curiae of Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America, et al. filed.
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including January 27, 2025.
Motion to extend the time to file a response from December 26, 2024 to January 27, 2025, submitted to The Clerk.
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due December 26, 2024)
Nutramax Laboratories, Inc. and Nutramax Laboratories Veterinary Sciences, Inc., Petitioner, represented by David Ryan Carpenter
Justin Lytle, et al., Respondent, represented by Adina H. Rosenbaum
Justin Lytle, et al., Respondent, represented by Adam Ross Pulver
The Chamber of Commerce of The United States of America, The Product Liability Advisory Council, Inc., The National Association of Manufacturers, and The American Property Casualty Insurance Association, Amicus Curiae, represented by Matthew Allen Fitzgerald