from the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
See other cases from the Second Circuit.
Motion for reconsideration of order denying leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed by petitioner DENIED.
Motion for reconsideration of order denying leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed by petitioner.
The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is denied, and the petition for a writ of certiorari is dismissed. See Rule 39.8. As the petitioner has repeatedly abused this Court's process, the Clerk is directed not to accept any further petitions in noncriminal matters from petitioner unless the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) is paid and the petition is submitted in compliance with Rule 33.1. See Martin v. District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 506 U. S. 1 (1992) (per curiam).
Waiver of right of respondents Valerie Raudonis, David Tencza, Jack S. White, Welts, White & Fontaine, PC to respond filed.
Waiver of Valerie Raudonis, David Tencza, Jack S. White, Welts, White & Fontaine PC not accepted for filing. (November 25, 2024)
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due February 24, 2025)
Application (24A113) granted by Justice Sotomayor extending the time to file until September 9, 2024.
Application (24A113) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from July 11, 2024 to September 9, 2024, submitted to Justice Sotomayor.
Baboucar B. Taal, Petitioner, pro se
Valerie Raudonis, David Tencza, Jack S. White, Welts, White & Fontaine, PC, Respondent, represented by Israel Francisco Piedra