Denied

No. 25-327

Express Scripts, Inc., et al. v. California

from the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

See other cases from the Ninth Circuit.

Docket Entries

Petition DENIED.

Reply of petitioners Express Scripts, Inc., et al. filed. (Distributed)

DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/9/2026.

Brief of respondent California in opposition filed.

Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted in part and the time is extended to and including December 9, 2025.

Reply of California submitted.

Response of Express Scripts, Inc., et al. to motion submitted.

Motion to extend the time to file a response from December 1, 2025 to January 15, 2026, submitted to The Clerk.

Response Requested. (Due December 1, 2025)

DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/7/2025.

Brief amicus curiae of Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America filed. (Distributed)

Waiver of right of respondent California to respond filed.

Response to motion to expedite from respondent California filed.

Motion to expedite consideration of the petition for writ of certiorari filed by petitioners.

Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due October 20, 2025)

Parties

Express Scripts, Inc., et al., Petitioner, represented by Christopher George Michel

OptumRx, Inc., Petitioner, represented by Brian David Boone

OptumRx, Inc., Petitioner, represented by Matthew Phillip Hooker

California, Respondent, represented by Louis M. Bograd

Amici Curiae

Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America, Amicus Curiae, represented by Benjamin W. Snyder

 
Last updated: April 18, 2026