Denied

No. 25-38

Seth Adam Lilly v. Melissa Ann Lilly

from the Court of Appeals of Indiana

See other cases from Indiana.

Docket Entries

Petition DENIED.

DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/7/2025.

Brief of respondent Melissa Ann Lilly in opposition filed.

Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is further extended to and including October 23, 2025.

Motion to extend the time to file a response from September 23, 2025 to October 23, 2025, submitted to The Clerk.

Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including September 23, 2025.

Motion to extend the time to file a response from August 11, 2025 to September 23, 2025, submitted to The Clerk.

Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due August 11, 2025)

Parties

Seth Lilly, Petitioner, represented by Michael James Confusione

Melissa Lilly, Respondent, represented by Bryan Lee Ciyou

 
Last updated: April 18, 2026