from the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
See other cases from the Ninth Circuit.
Petition Dismissed - Rule 46.
Joint stipulation to dismiss the petition for a writ of certiorari pursuant to Rule 46.1 filed.
Rule 29.6 Supplemental Statement Letter of Epic Games, Inc. submitted.
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is further extended to and including March 9, 2026.
Motion to extend the time to file a response from February 6, 2026 to March 9, 2026, submitted to The Clerk.
Response of Epic Games, Inc. to motion submitted.
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including February 6, 2026.
Motion to extend the time to file a response from January 7, 2026 to February 6, 2026, submitted to The Clerk.
Response Requested. (Due January 7, 2026)
Motion of petitioners to hold petition in abeyance filed.
Waiver of right of respondent Epic Games, Inc. to respond filed.
Brief amicus curiae of Antitrust Education Project filed.
Brief amicus curiae of ACT - The App Association filed.
Brief amicus curiae of International Center for Law & Economics filed.
Brief amicus curiae of TechNet filed.
Brief amicus curiae of Committee for Justice filed.
Brief amicus curiae of Center For Cybersecurity Policy and Law filed.
Brief amicus curiae of Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America filed.
Brief amici curiae of Chamber of Progress, et al. filed.
Brief amici curiae of Former National Security Officials, et al. filed.
Brief amicus curiae of Washington Legal Foundation filed.
Brief amici curiae of Computer Security Experts John Mitchell, et al. filed.
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due November 28, 2025)
Google LLC, et al., Petitioner, represented by Neal Kumar Katyal
Epic Games, Inc., Respondent, represented by Gary Andrew Bornstein
Act - The App Association, Amicus Curiae, represented by Jonathan Yates Ellis
Antitrust Education Project, Amicus Curiae, represented by Gene Clayton Schaerr
Center For Cybersecurity Policy and Law, Amicus Curiae, represented by Elizabeth Catherine Rinehart
Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America, Amicus Curiae, represented by Jean-Claude Andre
Chamber of Progress and NetChoice, Amicus Curiae, represented by Benjamin William Berkowitz
Computer Security Experts John Mitchell, Serge Egelman, Kevin Butler, Amit Elazari, Guofei Gu, and Sharad Mehrotra, Amicus Curiae, represented by Robert Thomas Smith
Former National Security Officials and Scholars, Amicus Curiae, represented by Roy T. Englert Jr.
TechNet, Amicus Curiae, represented by Laura Beth Ruppalt
The Committee for Justice, Amicus Curiae, represented by John Michael Reeves Jr.
The International Center for Law & Economics, Amicus Curiae, represented by Wesley R. Powell
Washington Legal Foundation, Amicus Curiae, represented by Cory L. Andrews