from the Court of Appeal of California, Sixth Appellate District
See other cases from California.
Motion for reconsideration of order denying leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed by petitioner DENIED.
Motion for reconsideration of order denying leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed by petitioner.
The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is denied, and the petition for a writ of certiorari is dismissed. See Rule 39.8. As the petitioner has repeatedly abused this Court's process, the Clerk is directed not to accept any further petitions in noncriminal matters from petitioner unless the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) is paid and the petition is submitted in compliance with Rule 33.1. See Martin v. District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 506 U. S. 1 (1992) (per curiam).
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due October 6, 2025)
Application (24A1134) granted by Justice Kagan extending the time to file until June 28, 2025.
Application (24A1134) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from April 29, 2025 to June 28, 2025, submitted to Justice Kagan.
Fareed Sepehry-Fard, Petitioner, pro se