from the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
See other cases from the Ninth Circuit.
The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is denied, and the petition for a writ of certiorari is dismissed. See Rule 39.8. As the petitioner has repeatedly abused this Court's process, the Clerk is directed not to accept any further petitions in noncriminal matters from petitioner unless the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) is paid and the petition is submitted in compliance with Rule 33.1. See Martin v. District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 506 U. S. 1 (1992) (per curiam). Justice Jackson, dissenting: I respectfully dissent from the order barring this incarcerated petitioner from filing future <i>in forma pauperis</i> petitions in noncriminal matters. See <i>Howell</i> v. <i>Circuit Court of Indiana</i>, 607 U. S. ___ (2026) (Jackson, J., dissenting).
Waiver of right of respondent Ryan Thornell, et al. to respond filed.
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due January 15, 2026)
Edward F. Parks, Petitioner, pro se
Ryan Thornell, et al., Respondent, represented by Jimmy Dale Nielsen